Theorem 3.1.4 shows that the Laplace transform of a sum is a sum of Laplace transforms. One might wonder if the Laplace transform of a product is the product of Laplace transforms. Unfortunately, that simply isn’t true (see if you can figure out why)! However, there is a special type of function "multiplication", called a convolution, whose Laplace transform is a product of Laplace transforms.
Definition3.5.1.Convolution.
Let \(f\) and \(g\) be piecewise continuous on \(t\geq 0\text{.}\) The convolution of \(f\) and \(g\text{,}\) written \(f*g\) is defined by
Its corresponding inverse \(h(t)=\mathcal{L}^{-1}\{H\}(t)\) is called the weight of the system. Then the convolution \(\displaystyle\int_0^t h(\tau)g(t-\tau)\mathrm{d}\tau\) is called the Duhamel’s principle of the system.
Integro-differential equations are useful when hte position/response variable is written in terms of itself. This is partiuclarly true for LRC circuits.
Example3.5.9.
Recall that for a single-loop or series circuit, Kirchoff’s second law states that the sum of the voltage drops across an indcutor, resistor, and capacitor is equal to the impressed voltage \(E(t)\text{.}\) Then the current \(i(t)\) is governed by \(Li'(t)+Ri(t)+\dfrac{1}{C} \displaystyle\int_0^t i(\tau)\mathrm{d}\tau=E(t)\text{.}\)
Find the current \(i(t)\) in a single-loop LRC circuit where \(L=1 \text{h}\text{,}\)\(R=4 \Omega\text{,}\)\(C=0.25 f\text{,}\)\(i(0)=0\text{,}\) and the impressed voltage is \(E(t)=e^{-2t}\text{.}\)